翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n
・ United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.
・ United States v. Spearin
・ United States v. Sprague
・ United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.
・ United States v. Stanley
・ United States v. Steever
・ United States v. Stevens
・ United States v. Stewart
・ United States v. Stewart (1940)
・ United States v. Stewart (2003)
・ United States v. Stickrath
・ United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
・ United States v. Sun Myung Moon
・ United States v. Swartz
United States v. Syufy Enterprises
・ United States v. The Amistad
・ United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs
・ United States v. Thomas
・ United States v. Thomas (1962)
・ United States v. Thomas (1997)
・ United States v. Thompson-Center Arms Co.
・ United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n
・ United States v. United Mine Workers of America
・ United States v. United States District Court
・ United States v. Univis Lens Co.
・ United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
・ United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
・ United States v. Vampire Nation
・ United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Syufy Enterprises : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Syufy Enterprises
''United States v. Syufy Enterprises'', 903 F.2d 659 (9th Cir. 1990), was an antitrust case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
==Facts==
The United States Department of Justice alleged that Syufy Enterprises had monopolized or attempted to monopolize the motion picture exhibition business in Las Vegas, Nevada. Raymond Syufy's opened a newly built six-screen multiplex in Las Vegas in 1981. The success of the Syufy theater led Mann Theatres and Plitt Theatres to exit the Las Vegas market, selling all of their theaters to Syufy. In 1984, Syufy bought out Cragin Industries' eleven-screen Redrock Theatre; upon completion of that purchase, Syufy then owned all of the first-run theaters in Las Vegas, leaving Roberts Company (which exhibited mostly second run films) as his sole competition in the city.
The Justice Department brought a case against Syufy for antitrust violations, arguing that "you may not get monopoly power by buying out your competitors."

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Syufy Enterprises」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.